首页> 外文OA文献 >Non-Animal Models of Wound Healing in Cutaneous Repair:In Silico, In Vitro, Ex Vivo And In Vivo Models Of Wounds And Scars In Human Skin
【2h】

Non-Animal Models of Wound Healing in Cutaneous Repair:In Silico, In Vitro, Ex Vivo And In Vivo Models Of Wounds And Scars In Human Skin

机译:皮肤修复伤口愈合的非动物模型:硅胶,体外,体外和体内伤口和人体皮肤疤痕的模型

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Tissue repair models are essential in order to explore the pathogenesis of wound healing and scar formation, identify new drug targets/biomarkers and to test new therapeutics. However, no animal model is an exact replicate of the clinical situation in man as in addition to differences in the healing of animal skin; the response to novel therapeutics can be variable when compared to human skin. The aim of this review is to evaluate currently available non-animal wound repair models in human skin, including: in silico, in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo. The appropriate use of these models is extremely relevant to wound-healing research as it enables improved understanding of the basic mechanisms present in the wound-healing cascade and aid in discovering better means to regulate them for enhanced healing or prevention of abnormal scarring. The advantage of in silico models is that they can be used as a first in virtue screening tool to predict the effect of a drug/stimulus on cells/tissues and help plan experimental research/clinical trial studies but remain theoretical until validated. In vitro models allow direct quantitative examination of an effect on specific cell types alone without incorporating other tissue-matrix components, which limits their utility. Ex vivo models enable immediate and short-term evaluation of a particular effect on cells and its surrounding tissue components compared with in vivo models that provide direct analysis of a stimulus in the living human subject before/during/after exposure to a stimulus. Despite clear advantages, there remains a lack of standardisation in design, evaluation and follow-up, for acute/chronic wounds and scars in all models. In conclusion, ideal models of wound-healing research are desirable and should mimic not only the structure plus cellular and molecular interactions, of wound types in human skin. Future models may also include organ/skin-on-a-chip with potential application in wound-healing research.
机译:组织修复模型对于探索伤口愈合和疤痕形成的发病机制,识别新的药物靶标/生物标志物以及测试新的治疗方法至关重要。但是,除了动物皮肤愈合方面的差异外,没有任何动物模型能够准确复制人类的临床情况。与人类皮肤相比,对新型疗法的反应可能会有所不同。这篇综述的目的是评估人类皮肤中当前可用的非动物伤口修复模型,包括:计算机,体外,离体和体内。这些模型的适当使用与伤口愈合研究极为相关,因为它可以增进对伤口愈合级联中存在的基本机制的了解,并有助于发现更好的手段来调节它们,以增强愈合或预防异常瘢痕形成。计算机模型的优势在于,它们可以用作筛选药物/刺激物对细胞/组织的作用并帮助计划实验研究/临床试验研究的第一个优点筛选工具,但在获得验证之前仍保持理论性。体外模型允许直接定量检测单独对特定细胞类型的影响,而无需合并其他组织基质成分,这限制了它们的实用性。与体内模型相比,离体模型能够对细胞及其周围组织成分的特定作用进行即时和短期评估,而体内模型可以直接分析活人受试者在受到刺激之前/之中/之后的刺激。尽管有明显的优势,但在所有模型中,急性/慢性伤口和疤痕的设计,评估和随访仍缺乏标准化。总之,理想的伤口愈合研究模型是理想的,并且不仅应模拟人类皮肤中伤口类型的结构以及细胞和分子相互作用。未来的模型可能还包括器官/单芯片皮肤,在伤口愈合研究中可能具有应用前景。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号